Implementing digital health in Thailand presents numerous challenges due to a combination of structural, cultural, and systemic factors, though there are some promising use cases emerging in the country. One significant hurdle is the fragmentation of the healthcare system, which spans public, private, and military sectors. This division leads to a lack of interoperability between digital platforms, making it difficult to create a seamless experience for patients and providers. Public hospitals, often operating on tight budgets, find it particularly challenging to invest in advanced digital infrastructure.
Despite these challenges, Thailand has seen success in specific digital health initiatives. For example, Paotang, a government-backed mobile app, integrates telemedicine services with financial incentives, allowing users to consult with doctors and manage their health expenses. Similarly, Chiiwii, a telemedicine platform, connects patients to licensed doctors for consultations via video calls, providing accessible healthcare to those in rural areas.
These initiatives demonstrate the potential of digital health to bridge gaps in care, but scaling such solutions remains difficult.
Digital literacy remains a significant barrier, particularly in rural areas where populations often lack the knowledge and tools to use digital health platforms effectively. Healthcare providers in these regions also face challenges with adopting advanced systems due to limited training and resources. Furthermore, inconsistent internet connectivity in rural areas undermines the reliability of telemedicine services, as seen in efforts to deploy telehealth solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic, where urban adoption outpaced rural implementation.
Data privacy and security further complicate digital health adoption. Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) introduces strict regulations, but many healthcare providers, particularly smaller clinics and hospitals, struggle to comply due to resource constraints. This issue is compounded by cultural resistance, as traditional face-to-face doctor-patient interactions are deeply ingrained in Thai society. For instance, efforts to implement AI-based diagnostic tools have met skepticism from patients and providers who prefer human interaction over machine-driven insights.
Cost is another barrier. Digital health solutions require significant investment in technology, training, and maintenance. Smaller clinics and public hospitals, such as those under the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS), often lack the funding to implement these solutions. The UCS itself has piloted some digital health projects, like electronic health records (EHRs), but the rollout has been uneven and hindered by limited infrastructure.
Promising use cases include the Thai Health Information Standards Development Center (THIS), which promotes standardization of EHRs across public hospitals, and the SMART Hospital initiative by Mahidol University’s Siriraj Hospital. These projects aim to digitize patient data and improve operational efficiency but require greater scalability and coordination to achieve nationwide impact.
Trust in digital health technologies also remains low. Many patients are hesitant to share personal health data, fearing misuse, while healthcare professionals resist adopting new systems due to concerns about increased workloads or obsolescence. Public-private partnerships, such as those involving mobile health apps like MorDee (Good Doctor), have made some progress in improving trust and accessibility by combining telehealth with prescription delivery services.
To overcome these challenges, Thailand must build on its successful use cases while addressing infrastructure gaps, fostering digital literacy, and creating a unified strategy. Collaboration among the government, healthcare providers, technology developers, and international partners will be essential to scale these solutions and create a robust, inclusive digital health ecosystem that benefits all Thais.
Comments